I think it is another version of the question whether God exist or not! But for me I think God existence plays an important balance in the world of today. Religions played a major role in shaping human morals and setting up standards for human’s values. Others may claim religions played a role in the discrimination cultures around the world, which in some cases is true. But what I believe, we need to believe in God, and in judgment day . Why? Human justice system is not perfects and full of loops, those of money and power in some cases may get a way with their wrong doings. Hence there should be some sort of place or time where someone holds you accountable for you good and wrong doings. It also gives motivation to be a good person. Why should I be a good person in this world of today? If I respected the law does this make me a good person? If I can do wrong acts and escape from the law and not get caught then why should I hold on to good morals? Someone said before “A crimi...
This April the 15th, 2025 marks the second anniversary of Sudan’s devastating civil war, a conflict that has ravaged the nation, displaced millions, and left thousands dead (1). Initially triggered by a power struggle between the Sudanese Armed Forces (SAF) and the paramilitary Rapid Support Forces (RSF), the war has since escalated into a prolonged and deeply destructive confrontation with far-reaching implications for Sudan and the wider region. The conflict has also opened the door to increasing foreign interference, with regional and international actors vying for influence in Sudan’s future(2). As the war rages on, the prospects for a ceasefire—and even more so for a lasting peace—remain remote. The humanitarian crisis deepens daily, while the political and territorial integrity of Sudan hangs in the balance (3). Origins of the Conflict: A Broken Transition Sudan’s descent into conflict began with the peaceful uprising of 2019, which led to the overthrow of longtime autocrat...
The comparison between supporters of the Sudanese Armed Forces (SAF) in Sudan and those who supported Bashar al-Assad in Syria has some parallels but also important differences. Both situations involve complex conflicts driven by a mix of local, regional, and international factors, and the motivations of supporters in each case vary significantly. Similarities: 1. State vs. Insurgent Dynamics : Supporters of both SAF and Assad often frame their stance as supporting the legitimate government or state apparatus against what they perceive as insurgents, rebels, or illegitimate actors (RSF in Sudan and various rebel groups in Syria). 2. Desire for Stability : Many supporters in both cases prioritise stability over political reforms or revolutionary change. They may fear that the fall of the state would lead to prolonged chaos, as seen in post-Gaddafi Libya or Iraq after the US invasion. 3. Regional and International Alliances : Both SAF and Assad regimes have relied on international ...
Comments
Post a Comment